Solder joint failure is often "hidden": the appearance is intact and electrical testing passes, but cracking occurs after temperature cycling or mechanical vibration. For this reason, customers in automotive electronics, power devices, hybrid vehicles, and high-reliability microelectronics industries are increasingly inclined to use strength data rather than visual inspection to judge solder joint quality.
The difficulty of strength testing lies in "whether the results can be repeated." When selecting equipment, you can focus on three things:
For micro-features such as micro-bumps, copper pillars, and TSV, an imaging system is also needed to assist alignment - side-view cameras, aperture (endoscope-style) imaging, and high-magnification image acquisition can significantly reduce human alignment errors.
Commonly used criteria in the industry include IPC-9708 / JEITA EIAJ ET-7407, the JEDEC JESD22 series (B117A copper pillar shear, B115 cold bump pull, B116 gold ball shear, B109 flat pull), ASTM F1269, and relevant methods in MIL STD 883. When selecting equipment, confirming whether it covers these methods is very helpful for passing customer audits.
It is recommended to bind strength data with process parameters for archiving: once a customer raises reliability concerns, historical data can be used to demonstrate that "this solder joint has always been stable," which is more convincing than a single inspection.
Over the past two years, the biggest variable in the PCB industry has come from AI computi
Read more →
Wire Bonding is a key process for interconnecting chips, devices, and substrates. Common p
Read more →
In PCB quality control, "is the copper thickness sufficient, and is the coating correct" a
Read more →